![]() ![]() These options all use show control systems such as MSC, MIDI or OSC to fire a compatible lighting desk. We had much fewer options regarding the control of stage lighting systems. Prior to the release of QLab 4, we had many options for audio, video and show control cueing using QLab. It’s worth reflecting on the huge gear change that came with QLab 3, something that left users wondering what the upcoming QLab 4 release could possibly do to match the level of innovation that hit with the release of version 3. The leaps in functionality came in many areas, but video playback and manipulation complemented the other tools in audio and show control. Just when we were all bumbling along happily with QLab 2, version 3 appeared and hit us like a strangely pleasant baseball bat to the face. QLab 2 came with significant developments that made the product seem a lot more complete and ‘finished’. QLab has always enjoyed a high level of user interest in its development, a positive feedback loop that the team at Figure 53 has managed well. What Chris Ashworth and Figure 53 have always given us with QLab is possibility, not only in current incarnations but also scope for the future. Looking back QLab 1 was a functional playback tool for digital media that now seems quite raw. If you have been around for long enough to remember the release of previous QLab versions, you’ll have a handle on the development history. On Stage Lighting looks at the new lighting control capabilities of QLab 4 and considers future developments. Limitations consist of (a) Identification of CME needs (b) Determination of educational objectives (c) Selection and presentation of content (d) Selection of all persons and organizations that will be in a position to control the content of the CME (e) Selection of educational methods (f) Evaluation of the activity.So, the much anticipated QLab 4 has arrived and with it a new branch of functionality that may or may not have caught you by surprise. The AMA Standards for Commercial Support clearly prohibit any commercial interest from control of CME activities. ![]() The education programs provided by Philips are NOT eligible for AMA Category 1 CME credits through Philips. This activity may be available in multiple formats or from different sponsors. ARRT regulations state that an individual may not repeat a lecture presentation for credit if it was reported in the same biennium. However it is the responsibility of the REGISTRANT to assure the ASRT credits are acceptable for his or her purposes. Many of our courses are approved for CEU credit by the ASRT, which have been accepted by ARDMS and ICAEL, ICAVL. We have a wide variety of courses to accommodate your education needs, from core ultrasound courses to high level peer-to-peer courses. In this class the instructor will take you step by step through the basic system controls so the attendee will have a better understanding of the tools available to you for analysis and quantification. To perform image analysis and quantification, you load an image that has been acquired on a supported Philips ultrasound system into a specific Qapp you have selected. #QLAB REVIEW SOFTWARE#The QLAB software provides an environment in which you select a quantification tool to manipulate images. This socially engaging, purposefully-designed training allows participants the same quality education of an instructor-led classroom without the need or expense of traveling. Philips virtual training events typically range from 60-120 minutes in length with a maximum of 10 participants. Virtual training is synchronous, meaning that participants are connected at the same time as the facilitator. Each learner uses their own computer or other compatible device. ![]() ![]() Participants can be geographically dispersed and also individually connected. Virtual training is a facilitator-led, live online learning event that is delivered in a virtual environment. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |